Post by Toasted Cheese on Aug 2, 2020 10:44:49 GMT
Sean Penn and his cohorts are loathsome, but within the context and theme of the film, not to mention the backdrop of the amoral mess these soldiers were forced into, they were also casualties of this dirty, unethical and insidious conflict. How can something appear so wrong, when rightness is literally absent? As in all war, it becomes about a game of survival, not so much about fighting the "purported" enemy. The enemy rage is the instigator of this film's scenario, yet for what reason are the VC really the enemy?
In her only film, Thy Thu Le is absolutely heartbreaking. She doesn't speak a word of English and her performance as the kidnapped, tortured and raped young Vietnamese girl seems to transcend generic and traditional screen acting. This is almost the real thing we are witnessing and what a brave and courageous rendition she illustrates. She is absolutely devastating.
De Palma fully understands the visual medium of cinema and it is to his credit also, that he shows restraint and knows what to show and what to hold back on. The film is moderately graphic and even if MPAA rating issues at the time were a reason as to what can be shown, the less is more approach works exceptionally well here, both in the combat and sexually violent sequences. We see what needs to be seen and he is also a master of building tension which is the gripping part of this films presentation. Even with Oanh, when any sense of hope or reason is all but relinquished and all that she is left clinging onto is sheer futile desperation when closure is nothing but imminent, (also depicted earlier involving Brownie's fate and even the distressed fish out of water cherry later on in the film) De Palma shocks us, without slamming us. He also had a visually stunning backdrop for a canvas with which to paint his fine honed technical skills on as a director.
The film was a fizzer box office wise and I'd say much of that was due to the subject matter. It is a shame, because I find it one of the best releases of 89' and the Vietnam themed film that got most of the hype was Oliver Stone's Born On The Fourth Of July - 89' with Tom Cruise. I don't find Stone's film quite has the same emotional impact, or is as compelling, regardless of the austere and well-meaning approach. It's a bit bombastic.
For those interested, here is some more detail about the charges and outcomes of the convicted soldiers involved:
Incident On Hill 192
I was intrigued by the charges at the end of the film. Sean Penn's character who was the Sergeant and ring leader wasn't charged with rape, only unpremeditated murder and initially got 10yrs. The film depicted him as raping Oanh first.
Yes, it appears unfortunate, but as also thematically stated in the film, this was a wartime scenario and that they wouldn't end up serving anything too harsh. There would have been many many disgusting and unfathomable crimes committed towards the Vietnamese people that went officially unaccounted for. Oliver Stone briefly depicted the abduction and attempted rape of 2 young girls in Platoon - 86', only for the assailants to get accosted by Charlie Sheen's character before they went too far. Of course these sociopathic animals, which is an insult to beasts to place them in the same category, referred to him as a f@@@@t.
The whole thing was one big f<>king crime scene with legal license given to act like psychopathic pigs. These vet criminals though, have had to live with themselves and would that be easy?

