|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Aug 16, 2020 13:16:28 GMT
Which part of the Bible is untrue, or cannot be seen as the final arbiter then, Arlon? If one cannot tell, then it all falls suspect. Perhaps even you can understand that parables are not "true" in the sense of names, times and places. That doesn't mean they don't have value or lessons somewhat like the fiction in half the library. So when you speak of truth you don't really mean 'truth', just 'value'.. Got it. It seems an odd qualification of your argument in lieu of all you have been arguing viz-a-vis truth, right down to defining it from the original, and talking of God's supposed 'truth for His people'. Something untrue can be valuable of course, when it suits a purpose like persuading the credulous. Also, the Bible is also not entirely made up of parables, just sayin'.
|
|