Post by hehatesshe on Nov 10, 2020 16:44:00 GMT
Lamar Jackson .833
Patrick Mahomes .800
Tom Brady .771
Jimmy Garoppolo .750
Ben Roethlisberger .681
Russell Wilson .680
Aaron Rodgers .667
Jared Goff .613
Josh Allen .611
Dak Prescott .609
Drew Brees .599
Mitchell Trubisky .591
Alex Smith .587
Teddy Bridgewater .581
Matt Ryan .566
Joe Flacco .563
Carson Wentz .555
Philip Rivers .552
Cam Newton .546
Tyrod Taylor .533
Andy Dalton .528
Trevor Siemian .520
Ryan Tannehill .519
Nick Foles .519
Matt Schaub .505
Kirk Cousins .500
Matt Moore .500
Worst (10+ games)
DeShone Kizer .000
C.J. Beathard .100
Cody Kessler .167
Josh Rosen .188
Daniel Jones .238
Colt McCoy .250
Blaine Gabbert .271
Dwayne Haskins .273
Mike Glennon .273
Josh McCown .303
Blake Bortles .329
Chad Henne .340
Sam Darnold .344
Nick Mullens .364
Gardner Minshew .368
Jacoby Brissett .375
Geno Smith .387
Robert Griffin III .390
* - Or have not officially retired
Winning percentage is not an accurate indication of how good a quarterback is.
Lamar Jackson is not a better quarterback than Tom Brady.
Jimmy Garoppolo is not a better quarterback than Ben Roethlisberger and Russel Wilson.
Drew Brees and Matt Ryan are inaccurately being portrayed as average quarterbacks only because they play on mediocre teams.
You are comparing Jimmy G and his 32 games started to Big Ben and his 224, and to Russell Wilson and his 136. If Jimmy can continue to win 75% of his games for another 100 games, most people will consider him better than those two. But Jimmy won't even start another 100 games.
Likewise, Lamar Jackson has started 35 games. If he continues to win 85% of his game for the next 10 years, he might be considered better than Brady. He'll need to do it in the postseason, though, and against good teams. Two things he had failed miserably at so far.
You can't compare a couple seasons to a hall of fame resume.