|
|
Post by movieliker on Nov 10, 2020 16:50:07 GMT
I disagree. These stats are virtually useless. Wins are mostly dependent on the team, coaches, players, defense, offense, talent level, etc. Winning percentage is not an accurate indication of how good a quarterback is. Lamar Jackson is not a better quarterback than Tom Brady. Jimmy Garoppolo is not a better quarterback than Ben Roethlisberger and Russel Wilson. Drew Brees and Matt Ryan are inaccurately being portrayed as average quarterbacks only because they play on mediocre teams. You are comparing Jimmy G and his 32 games started to Big Ben and his 224, and to Russell Wilson and his 136. If Jimmy can continue to win 75% of his games for another 100 games, most people will consider him better than those two. But Jimmy won't even start another 100 games. Likewise, Lamar Jackson has started 35 games. If he continues to win 85% of his game for the next 10 years, he might be considered better than Brady. He'll need to do it in the postseason, though, and against good teams. Two things he had failed miserably at so far. You can't compare a couple seasons to a hall of fame resume. I'm not comparing anything. I'm just pointing out how useless these stats are.
|
|