|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Nov 10, 2020 17:02:07 GMT
You are comparing Jimmy G and his 32 games started to Big Ben and his 224, and to Russell Wilson and his 136. If Jimmy can continue to win 75% of his games for another 100 games, most people will consider him better than those two. But Jimmy won't even start another 100 games. Likewise, Lamar Jackson has started 35 games. If he continues to win 85% of his game for the next 10 years, he might be considered better than Brady. He'll need to do it in the postseason, though, and against good teams. Two things he had failed miserably at so far. You can't compare a couple seasons to a hall of fame resume. I'm not comparing anything. I'm just pointing out how useless these stats are. They aren't useless at all though, as pointed out by how your argument against them was destroyed.
|
|