|
|
Post by Dirty Santa PaulsLaugh on Nov 15, 2020 6:25:06 GMT
Well, I know the part about church clergy being overrun with sex perverts all over the world, however I don't think even the Catholic church forces its rape victims...raped by church pedophiles...to listen to herself being raped, then shame her for being a sinner! Then get the freaking supreme court to back them up because this is a religious thing. Jesus Christ, man. Why you are defending this? When did raping girls and boys get to be holy sacred thing? Did you really just accuse me of sanctifying rape? WTF, Paul? Maybe where you and I differ is that I don't care if it's a priest, a politician, a stranger, or my best friend. I don't hold any of them less guilty than any of the others. Not unless you fully read what I wrote in the first post. But here's the issue: this church claiming they have a God-given right to mentally abuse a 15 year old girl because a church elder raped her. Rather than putting the elder on church trial, they decided to investigate not her assailant but her—for the crime of having sex outside of marriage.
In what situation would a non-religious person get away with this in federal court. You sure you want to equivocate this as not exclusive to religious people? Do you need to take a shower before you answer? It was a fucking rape. She 15, even if she gave some consent, it's still rape. And she is guilty one because she let herself get raped outside of marriage. Which in her particular church is a crime? When did churches in the United States of America start judging crimes outside of a courtroom? Do you think the supreme court should side with the church or the victim?
|
|