|
|
Post by clusium on Nov 15, 2020 6:25:39 GMT
You got a point there. However, you could make the very same argument in cases where perpetrators were the victims own parents, grandparents, etc. I don't see how those are even remotely similar. Parents aren't claiming to be the voice or moral absolutism and are not part of a extremely rich and powerful organization who's entire purpose is claim moral superiority to the entire world. Whether they are part of an extremely rich & powerful organization or not is a moot point. Parents are the moral authority for children. So when a parent sexually abuses a child, it breaks a sacred trust.
|
|
