Post by Arlon10 on Nov 17, 2020 7:39:21 GMT

Those pages by the way admit having the purpose (bias) of calming uproar or "moral panic." That's because "science" and "research" are not really given access to enough data to do anything else. There is no central reporting agency. When the police are suspected of participating in satanism, they aren't likely to be the "trusted" people to whom victims turn. The data is therefore necessarily "anecdotal." Of course all data is anecdotal at some point.
The "organization" with the most child abuse is probably Satan worship. As you might have guessed, exact numbers are difficult to establish.
Did you read my reply? I noticed that there is no central reporting agency. Some are based on police reports, some on people seeking mental health professionals, and some on press or whatever. If you don't get all the reports how can you dismiss all of them? Answer: You can't. Also I did read those links and they did not exactly claim there were "zero" actual cases. That's not what I meant by putting things in your own words. You aren't supposed to change what any study says. You're supposed to show you understand what the studies say. They found excuses to dismiss cases based on lack of access to proof. Why would "scientists" do that? They told you. To calm the uproar.
Also notice I set "organization" off in quotation marks. That's because the public is not likely apprised of the actual one. And there probably is more abuse with no meaningful connection to any organization including, topical here, the Catholic Church.

