|
|
Post by gameboy on Nov 17, 2020 20:40:16 GMT
It has some homophobic undertones but it was a decent movie. I don't have an issue with MC and any homophobic undertones it may have for some reason and usually I would be the first to jump on the phobic bandwagon.The film entirely encapsulates its era and attitudes. It does depict male hustling as being a sleazy last resort that only the desperate will engage in, but by the flip side, the same can also be said for female prostitution. Joe Buck was depicted in a movie theater getting blown, but that was out of convenience as well and was at the same time a sad and compassionate scene with the kid who couldn't then pay him. That kid did annoy me though, as he had no business taking advantage either if he had no money. He should have had a wank. Joe was depicted as selling himself to women in a proper apartment bed and he was with that old dude near the end in a hotel room. Ratso derided it as fa@@otry and referred to gays as "fruits", but it was in character and him and Joe had a very strong male bonding, even if not sexual. Who'd want to get it on with that filthy sewer rat anyway...  Hoffman tends to get most of the praise for this film, but Voigt was the revelation for me. It's been a long time since I saw the movie but the kid probably thought it was consensual sex. Movie theaters used to be popular cruising spots back in the day.
It just depicts the whole gay world as rather sordid. Also odds are that the cowboy was downlow and gay anyway. Any male prostitute who has sex with men is at least bisexual. I believe they hinted that he was gay. There is a dream sequence as well where Ratso imagines himself running shirtless on the beach with the cowboy. The homoerotic allusions run throughout the film.
Gay men's passions always lead them to death. It's homophobic but it was a much more homophobic world back then.
|
|