Who is more cautious?

"There are no numbers for any of those things. You need those numbers. Remember now?"

Uh it gave plenty of numbers:

"Growth in CO₂ emissions from fossil fuel use slowed to around 1% per year in the past decade, down from 3% during the 2000s. An unprecedented decline is expected in 2020, due to the COVID-19 economic slowdown. Daily CO₂ fossil fuel emissions declined by 17% in early April at the peak of global confinement policies, compared with the previous year. But by early June they had recovered to a 5% decline.
"


"Current concentrations in the atmosphere are, respectively, 147%, 259% and 123% of those present before the industrial era began in 1750.



"Concentrations measured at Hawaii's Mauna Loa Observatory and at Australia's Cape Grim station in Tasmania show concentrations continued to increase in 2019 and 2020. In particular, CO₂ concentrations reached 414.38 and 410.04 parts per million in July this year, respectively, at each station.
"

"The global average surface temperature from 2016 to 2020 will be among the warmest of any equivalent period on record, and about 0.24℃ warmer than the previous five years.
"


"This five-year period is on the way to creating a new temperature record across much of the world, including Australia, southern Africa, much of Europe, the Middle East and northern Asia, areas of South America and parts of the United States."


"Another problem is those two dimensional temperature "maps." Guess what? The world is three dimensional. The highest clouds are five miles high. The arctic might seem warmer merely because it lacks clouds to block IR.
"

 Wait, are you unironically writing off temperature maps because they don't look like the actual earth? You realize these are just models to show the data that has already been gathered, right? Do you think climate scientists make little flat earth maps and do their "research" on those? Holy shit, are you really this smooth brained?