Who is more cautious?

I never said "doom" stop strawmanning me. And I also  did not say I "have no idea", another garbage strawman. You accused me of not measuring the temperature myself, which is absurd, how would I do that myself? You realize that would probably require costly equipment? That's what actual climate scientists are for, I've already addressed this point. Now instead of doing more silly ad homs and strawmans, this is the part where you say, "Well that data point is wrong because (cite a study)". But let's face it your not gonna do that because you don't have any actual data, so the next best thing you can do is avoid actually addressing the data and resort to more pathetic ad homs.