|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Nov 26, 2020 19:31:02 GMT
 Wait are you unironically arguing I have to actually do scientific studies myself for them to be valid? Holy shit are you really this stupid? So if someone argues with you about how brain surgery works and shows you medical studies, and your response is "Well you didn't actually do the brain surgery yourself, you didn't show your own work!" you think that's a perfectly valid response? OK, you're trolling, no one is seriously this stupid. You got me. Let's say just for the purposes of discussion that the site you linked is a fraud. How would you know? Another thing, suppose the site you linked is a deliberate trap for lazy kids on the internet. How would you know? How would you avoid being caught in the trap? "Let's say just for the purposes of discussion that the site you linked is a fraud. How would you know?" So do you think NASA is lying? Is that really the angle you're going with, Alex Jones? Do you also think the moon landing was faked? If you're gonna use that argument, I could just as easily throw that at any study you give me (including your own). You do realize to do the same studies as climate scientists would require expensive equipment and travelling all over the world, something that I don't have the time or money for? Are you really this absurd? Do you see why this a dumb argument? "Another thing, suppose the site you linked is a deliberate trap for lazy kids on the internet. How would you know? How would you avoid being caught in the trap?" Are you really gonna try and argue NASA is a "deliberate trap for lazy kids on the internet"? I'm gonna ask you again (and actually answer this time), if two people are arguing about brain surgery is it perfectly to dismiss whatever data is thrown at you simply because the person doesn't actually do brain surgery themselves?
|
|