Who is more cautious?

"Let's say just for the purposes of discussion that the site you linked is a fraud. How would you know?"

So do you think NASA is lying? Is that really the angle you're going with, Alex Jones? Do you also think the moon landing was faked? If you're gonna use that argument, I could just as easily throw that at any study you give me (including your own). You do realize to do the same studies as climate scientists would require expensive equipment and travelling all over the world, something that I don't have the time or money for? Are you really this absurd? Do you see why this a dumb argument?

"Another thing, suppose the site you linked is a deliberate trap for lazy kids on the internet. How would you know? How would you avoid being caught in the trap?"

Are you really gonna try and argue NASA is a "deliberate trap for lazy kids on the internet"?

I'm gonna ask you again (and actually answer this time), if two people are arguing about brain surgery is it perfectly to dismiss whatever data is thrown at you simply because the person doesn't actually do brain surgery themselves?