|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Nov 30, 2020 12:53:45 GMT
My view was based off of chromosomes and the ability to procreate. But you have chosen to define gender in that narrow way. There's no scientific evidence that obliges you to define it that way - it's a judgement call on your part. The ability to procreate is a bit problematic too. Plenty of people are born without the ability to procreate - what gender would they be? Biology deals in facts. Although psychology and elements of psychiatry are often considered "science" they can deal in far less readily measured parameters. Basing a definition of gender on biology is in fact a very scientific and practical way of doing things.
|
|