|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Nov 30, 2020 13:35:53 GMT
Biology deals in facts. Although psychology and elements of psychiatry are often considered "science" they can deal in far less readily measured parameters. Basing a definition of gender on biology is in fact a very scientific and practical way of doing things. gender /ˈdʒɛndə/ noun 1. either of the two sexes (male and female), especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. The term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female. sex /sɛks/ ... 2. either of the two main categories (male and female) into which humans and most other living things are divided on the basis of their reproductive functions. "adults of both sexes" 1) I am not in elementary school, I graduated that and much more. 2) My words mean what I tell you they mean, and if you had any sense, graduated elementary school yourself, and could think clearly and precisely you would use words the way I do. 3) I explained why using "cultural" determinants of gender is error prone. You do that a lot. You depend on definitions that have no precise or standard criteria. Thus you are a hopeless muddle brain. We noticed this before with your concepts of "gnostic and agnostic." 4) Using a biological determinant is far less error prone, has far more wide agreement, and is thus more useful. That is my point here. 5) Since no dictionary listing is based on anything but usage and sometimes usage is muddled, you may not use a dictionary to argue any facts in question. Only people as seriously brain damaged as you argue facts with a dictionary.
|
|