|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Dec 1, 2020 22:18:36 GMT
Well to be fair (for legal and social reasons one presumes) Hume was careful never to declare God does not exist per se, although his writings were seen as atheistic. Perhaps his argument against miracles was a roundabout way of saying the supernatural doesn't exist without actually saying it. But taken on its own merit, I think the argument is flawed. Well, although I respect your view, I can't agree. It seems perfectly reasonable to compare the evidence for two proposals about reality and go for the option as most likely which has the most (or any). It is after all something we all do all the time.
|
|
