|
|
Post by ReyKahuka on Dec 15, 2020 19:50:33 GMT
Is it? Article says 2016. Regardless, it's bullshit. Then there's this. Do you think this list of entire tribes and native organizations is a better representation of how native peoples feel about the name, as opposed to people called at random who may not even be Native American? When I think of PETA and Co...no, absolutely not. How many members do they have, who is financing them, what is their actual agenda?! Another guy made this argument a few years ago. What is their actual agenda? Good question. I'll let you ponder the agenda of tribal leaders when asked whether they're offended by racist language.
|
|