|
|
Post by onethreetwo on Dec 15, 2020 21:07:38 GMT
Of course some asshole is going to argue Redskins isn't racist because the truth makes him uncomfortable. Worse, it would cause him to change his perspective. It's a lot easier to assume you're always right than it is to consider your own ignorance. (And the ones who feel guilty are the ones in denial. I know you know that, too.) It's right here in your posts, whether it's football or this topic; I post factual evidence, you post your opinion, backed by nothing. One of your bullet points is debunked in the very article you linked, but you use half the quote to try to prove a point you can't make. You argue like a nine year old. Hey, maybe if you appeal to my pride with goofy comments about 'cleaning my clock,' you can make the argument about nothing but the argument itself and everyone will lose track of the fact that you've been proven 100% wrong and have no idea what you're talking about in either topic. Indian sports nicknames are racist and are disappearing before your eyes; The Patriots kept winning no matter who they were playing in the Tom Brady era; the Saints shit the bed in the playoffs on a regular basis. These are all absolute facts, not opinions, whether you like it or not. Come up with some new material. I agree, the Redskins should change their mascot name. Because the team wants to be referred to as winners. These "redskins" are and were obviously losers. Because they not only lost the war for America with the white man. But they are consumate babies who are so sensitive about it, they won't even allow the white man to use them as a compliment referring to them as brave, heroic and vicious fighters. We should erase them from history because obviously they were an extremely insignificant group of people who were so primitive, they were gonna lose the Americas sooner or later, to somebody or something, inevitably. Yikes dude. You don't really mean that, do you?
|
|