|
|
Post by SciFive on Jan 5, 2021 9:59:29 GMT
I've been agreeing there is no proof since about page 1. That's just been a strawman you've been endlessly skewering. Now you're agreeing there's no evidence either. Good, so we're back to my original question about why assume God exists at all. As for your reasons: 1) Parents are just humans and as likely to be wrong as anyone else. 2) Ok... 3) Your happiness has no bearing on the truth of a hypothesis. 4) Ok... Yes, it's a personal decision, which is fine, but it's clear you have no good reasons to believe, which makes the decision to believe irrational. If you want to believe because you think it "works" for you, then that's a pragmatic argument, and I don't have much to say against it; but if you're concerned with believing the truth, and not just what feels good, then you should care about having good evidence and/or reasons to believe, which you don't have. "The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw Telling people how to think (via insults) is arseholery. It’s understandable over politics, but it is inexcusable with something as personal as religious beliefs. The people who do this are arseholes.
|
|