|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Jan 18, 2021 4:28:13 GMT
Your ignorance is showing. If anything the 1930s is among the least, if not the least, pretentious decade for film. It would depend on how one defines pretentious, because while I don't have much point of reference as I haven't seen a lot of films from the 30's, mainly clips, they can look pretentious. I get the posters point.
pretentious /prɪˈtɛnʃəs/
adjective: pretentious
attempting to impress by affecting greater importance or merit than is actually possessed. "pretentious art films" h Similar: affected ostentatious chi-chi showy flashy tinselly conspicuous flaunty tasteless kitschy overambitious pompous artificial flatulent inflated overblown overripe fustian hyperventilated mannered high-flown high-sounding flowery grandiose big grand elaborate extravagant heroic flamboyant ornate grandiloquent magniloquent bombastic turgid orotund rhetorical oratorical sophomoric highfalutin la-di-da fancy-pants posey pseud pseudo poncy toffee-nosed dicty
Many of these synonym's do appear to fit from my own observation. I could be wrong, but sometimes if someone loves something, they may not want to hear anything that might taint that image, even if there is some truth behind it. Wow. That's a whole lot of synonyms there! I would say that showy, flashy, ornate and tinselly describe the look of a lot of 1930s films. But that's something about them that I like a lot. Some of those old movies are gorgeous to look at, especially if happen to like Art Deco. As far as stuff like the story and the acting, the words big, grand, grandiose, extravagant and heroic are all, i would say, pretty accurate. Take the 1932 BP Oscar winner "Grand Hotel", it's all of those things. It's pretty to look at *and JC gives the best performance in it* but I did find the movie pretty boring and pretentious.
|
|