Ant-Man could defeat Superman, says quantumn physicist

Irrelevant. A Public Defender is hired by the state. Does the Public Defender do what the D.A. wants?

Nope. Someone has to pay for the salary of the Public Defender. The state takes responsibility for that. But that doesn't mean the Public Defender has to do what the D.A. wants.

Likewise, someone has to pay for Marlow's consultation time. The Patriots weren't going to pay. So the NFL took responsibility for that. But that doesn't mean Marlow has to say what the NFL wants him to say.

The state pays for the Public Defender (which the defendant isn't able to pay for) to ensure that the defendant gets a fair trial. Likewise, the NFL paid for Marlow's consultation time (which the Patriots weren't going to pay for) to ensure that the investigation is reviewed by a highly-respected independent and unbiased expert.

In fact, Marlow wasn't hired by Wells to endorse Exponent's findings.  Marlow was hired by Wells to play Devil's Advocate and poke holes in Exponent's findings.  So that destroys your entire argument that Marlow was told to endorse Exponent's findings.  Marlow's job was to poke holes in Exponent's findings, but Marlow reviewed Exponent's findings and concluded that they were sound and had no holes.  Like I said before, I'll trust Professor Marlow's unbiased expertise over your biased and incorrect claims any day.

That's my point. Your quantum physicist is trying to apply Earth's laws of physics to Superman, but Earth's laws of physics don't apply to Kryptonians. Earth's laws of physics say that a man can't move faster than a speeding bullet, can't fly without a mechanism to generate lift, and can't use X-Ray vision to see through walls. Superman can do all those things because Earth's laws of physics don't apply to Kryptonians. Therefore, your quantum physicists' analysis is flawed and invalid.



Nope. You just admitted that Ant-Man's shrinking and growing can be explained by technology. If it can be explained by technology, then it's not magic.