Post by DC-Fan on May 27, 2017 18:47:18 GMT
That analogy didn't fail. That analogy is a perfect example of someone who gets paid to do an independent job and doesn't have to answer to the person paying him. Public Defenders don't answer to the D.A. The special prosecutor in the WaterGate investigation didn't have to answer to the President (Nixon was forced to resign, remember?). And Professor Marlow didn't have to answer to Goodell.
The NFL footed the bill for Professor Marlow to independently review Exponent's work and give his independent and unbiased conclusions because the Patriots didn't want to pay for it (because the Patriots were afraid of an independent and unbiased expert reviewing the evidence). But similar a Public Defender (who works independent of the D.A. and doesn't have to answer to the D.A.), Professor Marlow did his work independent of the NFL and didn't have to answer to Goodell or the NFL.
In fact, Marlow wasn't hired by Wells to endorse Exponent's findings. Marlow was hired by Wells to play Devil's Advocate and poke holes in Exponent's findings. But Professor Marlow reviewed Exponent's findings thoroughly and found no holes in it.
[/p][/quote]I and others found holes in Exponent's findings. Therefore Marlow is either incompetent or dishonest.[/quote]
So you are claiming that you know more than Professor Marlow, a Physics Professor and former Chairman of the Department of Physics at Princeton University. That's pretty arrogant and cocky, typical of arrogant Patriots fans.
It's not magic. Tens of thousands of years ago, a caveman might've thought that cell phones were magical devices. But we all know that there's nothing magical about cell phones. Same with the Ant-Man suit. There's nothing magical about it. It's just a piece of technology developed on Earth. And since Superman is invulnerable to Earth technology and weapons, Superman is invulnerable to the Ant-Man suit.