|
|
Post by DC-Fan on May 27, 2017 19:16:50 GMT
Yes it did. For your point to be valid, Goodell would have to be incorruptible. No, because Professor Marlow wasn't corrupt. Nixon was corrupt, but the special prosecutor wasn't corrupt. So even though Nixon was corrupt, the special prosecutor still conducted his investigation independent of the White House and didn't answer to the President. Same with Professor Marlow. Professor Marlow is highly-respected Professor at a highly-respected Ivy League university so Professor Marlow wasn't corrupt and he conducted his review and analysis independent of the NFL and didn't answer to the NFL or Goodell. Magic. Movie magic. Non-specific science made up for a movie. What's the difference? The difference is the non-specific science is still science and not magic.
|
|