Post by DC-Fan on May 28, 2017 2:40:56 GMT

Still irrelevant. The state hired the Public Defender. But the Public Defender works independent of the D.A.'s office and doesn't have to answer to the D.A. Likewise, Wells worked independent of the NFL and didn't have to answer to the NFL or Goodell. The only reason the NFL paid Wells to conduct the independent and unbiased investigation was because someone has to pay and the Patriots didn't want to pay for an independent and unbiased investigation so the NFL had to foot the bill for it in order to ensure that there was an independent and unbiased investigation.
In fact, not only is the Public Defender analogy a great analogy, but here's an even better analogy. Patriots TE Aaron Hernandez was arrested and charged with the murder of Odin Lloyd. Under the Constitution, Hernandez has the constitutional right to a trial by jury. But Hernandez didn't pay for his trial. The state paid for Hernandez trial. The state paid for the salaries of the judge, the clerk, the bailiff. The state paid for the tables and chairs in the courtroom and paid for the cost of electricity so the lights could be turned on in the courtroom. The state even pays a stipend to the jurors. Does that mean the jurors have to come back with the verdict that the state wants? Now do you realize how dumb and irrelevant your argument about the NFL paying for the Wells investigation is?
The jurors in the Hernandez murder trial were paid by the state, but they didn't have to come back with the verdict that the state wanted and could reach their verdict independently. Likewise, Wells and Marlow didn't have to come back with the verdict or finding that the NFL or Goodell wanted and could reach their verdict or finding independently.
So your lame argument has been completely debunked.

Nope. Like I said, just as the jurors in the Hernandez murder trial (who were paid a stipend by the state) didn't have to come back with the verdict that the state wanted, Wells didn't have to come back with the verdict that the NFL or Goodell wanted. So still irrelevant.

Nope. Like I said, just as the jurors in the Hernandez murder trial (who were paid a stipend by the state) didn't have to come back with the verdict that the state wanted, Wells didn't have to come back with the verdict that the NFL or Goodell wanted. So still irrelevant.

No, a D.A. can't do that. That's jury tampering and is illegal. D.A's don't do that and Goodell didn't do that either.

Wells isn't corrupt. Even Robert Kraft himself praised Wells for his independence and integrity when Wells was hired to conduct the independent investigation into DeflateGate. And the fact that Wells cleared Belicheat of any wrongdoing in DeflateGate clearly proves that Wells was unbised and objective in his investigation and his findings.
And Professor Marlow isn't corrupt. Professor Marlow is a highly-respected Professor of Physics at a highly-respected Ivy League university. Princeton is 1 of the most prestigious universities in the country so I doubt that they would let someone who is corrupt be the Chairman of their Department of Physics.

If a writer says quantum mechanics combined with comic book technology can hurt Superman, then quantum mechanics combined with comic book technology can hurt Superman.
And it's already been written and established through decades of comics that Superman is invulnerable to human techology and weapons. It's similar to how it was established by the writers of Greek mythology that any living creature that looks directly at the face of Medusa turns to stone. That's why Perseus was able to use Medusa to turn the Kraken into stone - because it was already established the writers of Greek mythology that would happen. So we're never going to find another story in Greek mythology where someone looks directly at the face of Medusa and doesn't turn to stone.

Nope. Like I said before, tens of thousands of years ago cavemen wouldn't be able to understand the technology that allows people to communicate on a cell phone with someone several thousand miles away. But that doesn't make cell phones "magical". We know that cell phones are just technology and there's nothing magical about cell phones.
Same with the Ant-Man suit. It's just technology and there's nothing magical about it. So since the Ant-Man suit is just technology and no magic and since Superman is invulnerable to human technology and weapons, ergo Superman is invulnerable to the Ant-Man suit.

