Post by zoilus on May 28, 2017 3:03:33 GMT
In fact, not only is the Public Defender analogy a great analogy, but here's an even better analogy. Patriots TE Aaron Hernandez was arrested and charged with the murder of Odin Lloyd. Under the Constitution, Hernandez has the constitutional right to a trial by jury. But Hernandez didn't pay for his trial. The state paid for Hernandez trial. The state paid for the salaries of the judge, the clerk, the bailiff. The state paid for the tables and chairs in the courtroom and paid for the cost of electricity so the lights could be turned on in the courtroom. The state even pays a stipend to the jurors. Does that mean the jurors have to come back with the verdict that the state wants? Now do you realize how dumb and irrelevant your argument about the NFL paying for the Wells investigation is?
The jurors in the Hernandez murder trial were paid by the state, but they didn't have to come back with the verdict that the state wanted and could reach their verdict independently. Likewise, Wells and Marlow didn't have to come back with the verdict or finding that the NFL or Goodell wanted and could reach their verdict or finding independently.
So your lame argument has been completely debunked.
Nope. Like I said, just as the jurors in the Hernandez murder trial (who were paid a stipend by the state) didn't have to come back with the verdict that the state wanted, Wells didn't have to come back with the verdict that the NFL or Goodell wanted. So still irrelevant.
No, a D.A. can't do that. That's jury tampering and is illegal. D.A's don't do that and Goodell didn't do that either.
Wells isn't corrupt. Even Robert Kraft himself praised Wells for his independence and integrity when Wells was hired to conduct the independent investigation into DeflateGate. And the fact that Wells cleared Belicheat of any wrongdoing in DeflateGate clearly proves that Wells was unbised and objective in his investigation and his findings.
And Professor Marlow isn't corrupt. Professor Marlow is a highly-respected Professor of Physics at a highly-respected Ivy League university. Princeton is 1 of the most prestigious universities in the country so I doubt that they would let someone who is corrupt be the Chairman of their Department of Physics.

If a writer says quantum mechanics combined with comic book technology can hurt Superman, then quantum mechanics combined with comic book technology can hurt Superman.

Same with the Ant-Man suit. It's just technology and there's nothing magical about it. So since the Ant-Man suit is just technology and no magic and since Superman is invulnerable to human technology and weapons, ergo Superman is invulnerable to the Ant-Man suit.
Just because you say it's irrelevant doesn't make it so. It's just an ipse dixit argument. It doesn't work.
Exponent's report is scientifically flawed, and that's a fact no analogy can make go away.
Marlow's approval of a scientifically flawed report proves he's either incompetent or dishonest. No analogy can make that go away.
It doesn't matter who praised or didn't praise Wells before the investigation was done. Everyone's a saint until they ain't.
Red lettering doesn't help your argument, it makes you look like a loon.
Saying Goodell isn't corrupt is another ipse dixit argument. He's a former Jets employee. He'd had a shit year with Rice and Peterson, he needed someone to punish harshly to repair his reputation. The Patriots provided such an opportunity with the non-scandal. The motivation is clear.
Comic book rules are flexible when it suits the story. Kryptonite can hurt Superman. Magic can hurt Superman. Why not Pym particles? See how easy it is? A writer can just say Pym particles give off a small amount of radiation similar to kryptonite.
Hell you could even introduce ants mutated by kryptonite and Ant-Man controls them. Their bites hurt Superman and they're immune to his heat vision etc. GG Clark.
