|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Mar 3, 2021 18:21:46 GMT
Yes, it is my educated opinion. Try getting one of your own. Of course it's hypothetical, unless you've invented time travel? All sports debates are hypothetical. Try making an actual argument instead of just calling me names. How is it Curry and Thompson, who thrive on the well spaced, minimal contact game of today dominate the same way when defenders would be right up on them all the time? You still don't understand it isn't about hard fouls, it's about physical defense in general. They aren't known for driving the lane, they have a limited offensive repertoire. The only way they'd put up big numbers would be if they were on a team with a dominant big, so they got open looks all night. Tell me how it would work in your fantasy world. I'm providing a hypothetical scenario, you can't even do that. "They'd figure it out." Great argument. Again, you're litreally asking about something that can't be proved. If Curry and Thompson played in the 80s and 90s, they would have trained according to the playing style of that era, in order to withstand the physical defense. They would've adjusted. This is the same pointless argument we had before. It's always going to be hypothetical, no matter what you say. There's no way to explain a dunderhead like you. No, I'm talking about this version of those players. Try again. Jordan of the 80s and 90s would dominate today if he appeared out of a time machine. How would Curry and Steph do in a more physical league? The fact that you won't answer that question speaks volumes.
|
|
