I FK'ing Love Age Of Ultron

May 31, 2017 7:17:59 GMT miike80 said:

May 31, 2017 7:06:33 GMT ArArArchStanton said:

Well there's a difference between, you personally didn't like her, and it being a flaw. I quite enjoyed her, it was what they intended to present, and by all accounts it was well executed.  A flaw is something they messed up on, didn't account for, or neglected.

I know i'm not the only one that sees her as a pointless, annoying character. Even people that love Thor movies think that. lots of them

I'm sure they do. That's not the same as a flaw. She's not useful to the plot, but that doesn't make her a useless character. She's there for levity and a different point of view.

If you're only point is that some things won't be liked by 100% of the audience, and therefore those things are flaws, then basically everything is a flaw, which I think is a rather pointless conversation. The point here is that she exists for a defined purpose, she accomplishes that role, and if it's just not your brand of comedy, then fine, I get it, but that doesn't constitute a flaw.

When I talk about flaws, I'm talking about things like structured plot elements of the film where it's clear the scene was not well thought out and/or executed. And example would be tornadocide in MOS. The reason that scene gets made fun of is a direct result of so many elements of the scene being forced together in a manner that makes very little sense. So the dog has to be there to get the dad to go back. The dad has to get stuck in order for it to make sense how the tornado has time to get close. Etc. Every bit of that scene is so transparent as to the writer trying to force his way to the death of Jonathan Kent in a very inorganic way, and that's what a flaw is.