|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on May 31, 2017 14:01:56 GMT
There's certainly no non-physical thing such as marriage, a fortiori because the very idea of non-physical things is incoherent. Seems kinda close to question-begging to me: "Every fact we think of must be physical because only physical facts can be thought of" I'm just answering at the moment because I want to make sure that we take care of one thing at a time, fully, if this is going to turn into a longer conversation. What you have in quotation marks isn't at all what I said, though, is it? It's not that everything must be physical because it must be physical. Rather, the very idea of non-physical existents is incoherent. That's a strong reason in favor of everything being physical instead. Does the distinction there make sense to you? |
|
