|
|
Post by gameboy on Apr 13, 2021 20:37:51 GMT
Oh, I have some major problems with a few of those. That makes it difficult to say they're objective. - Be brave. - A serial murderer can be brave. A Nazi soldier can be brave. Bravery in immorality is not moral. - Defer to superiors. - I don't buy this one at all. How does one make a judgment who is superior to whom? An anarchist holds no respect for the government. A slave holds no respect for a cruel master. - Divide resources fairly. - Under libertarian capitalism the rich have a right to resources earned through their own hard work. The lazy poor guy next door has no moral right to what the rich man owns. I agree with a fair sharing of resources. But who decides what's fair? Equal distribution of resources is the only fair way to a socialist. A capitalist doesn't agree with that.
I largely agree with you here, but I could have a major problem with two and two being four without rendering it subjective. Lets say when reasonable people have major objections which are easily explained, they can't be objective truths.
|
|