|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 1, 2017 1:39:38 GMT
Look at you ignoring all the other proof I just posted. Cracking tiles on a bathtub and denting the roof of a car yet not causing trajectory failure when riding on an arrow? Derailing a toy train? Are you going to address those or did I just prove that you do turn a blind eye and apply double standards? As for punching power, where in the movie is it explained that he somehow gains super strength or super striking power? If you listened closely to the movie you'd know that he hits that hard precisely because his mass is maintained and compacted into such a small size. If his mass isn't maintained then he also doesn't get that much strength to his hits. You can't have one while ignoring the other. Also, there is no such thing as falling power. I'm trying to have a proper discussion with you here, please don't insult my intelligence. I'm not ignoring anything. I addressed them directly and said they're all presented consistently, so I don't see the problem. The car was hit with an impact force, the arrow wasn't. There's a difference. I know you're very eager to proclaim that you've proven something, but you just haven't. You're resorting to hyper analyzing the physics of Ant Man. I mean if you're trying to convince me that there's a flaw in the MCU, surely you can do better than that. Ant Man was handled extremely well.
|
|