|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Apr 21, 2021 18:47:50 GMT
A quarter of this list of the top 100 films are from the 1990s, including two of the top five of all time. Cruise and DiCaprio-- they're leading men. They use leading men to get people to see the movie in the first place, it's a practice as old as stage acting. If you think Worthington is on the same talent level (or even the same stratosphere when it comes to presence or charisma) as those two, I don't know what to say. I never said Lando was a villain, I said his persona was a ridiculous stereotype. I most certainly didn't read his arc all wrong. At best he's an opportunist, and his character would be the first to tell you that. He morphs from scoundrel to hero over the series in a fashion similar to Han Solo. If film diversity has gone down, not up, what are you complaining about? This Hollywood conspiracy to elevate black people in film and depict whites as clueless, helpless, sinister beings has clearly failed.
I am not going to take the Hollywood Reporter as the litmus test for whether 1990s movies are considered good.
Put Cruise and DiCaprio next to Charlton Heston or John Wayne etc...they would look like bus boys. Even next to Mickey Rooney they would be struggling to hold the focus.
They just aren't the same type of charismatic leading man.
How was Lando a ridiculous stereotype? Were there many black industrialists depicted in movies then?
He was talking about mining and government interference. He didn't speak jive. Han Solo was a bum from the beginning. What did Lando call him? A loser?
Diversity in film variety has gone down as they emphasize diversity in race for film jobs.
Not a good thing. For anyone.
|
|