I FK'ing Love Age Of Ultron

I FK'ing Love Age Of Ultron Jun 1, 2017 15:18:07 GMT

Quote

Post by Skaathar on Jun 1, 2017 15:18:07 GMT

Jun 1, 2017 4:54:21 GMT ArArArchStanton said:

Jun 1, 2017 4:05:27 GMT Skaathar said:

Wow. Just wow. I lay down irrefutable inconsistencies in front of your face and you continue to ignore them and try to weasel out of them. If an ant falls in a tub, it is not heavy enough to crack the tub. Antman cracked it, and yet is light enough to ride an ant. How do you explain that? I don't think you understand how physics work. Even the ability to punch strong needs mass, a lot more mass than an ant has.

Also, you're ignoring the train feat.

That's because everything is treated consistently. The way his powers work is consistent. The tank keys, standing on a person's shoulder, riding an arrow, etc all are done without weight, and then punching and falling are all done with force. It's consistent.

Second, you've attempted to change the subject slightly. We were talking about things that were done poorly (bad) in the MCU, and you've pigeonholed that to just things you can point out as somewhat inconsistent in order to make a claim that therefore they must be admitted to be bad. Which brings me to

Third, nothing about Ant Man is presented poorly, from his powers to the dialogue, acting, etc. If all you can do is say that Ant Man physics are weird, then yeah, no shit, but they're presented in their optimal form in this film and I couldn't have asked for better.

So I don't know where this is going. You seem more interested in trying to get to a place where you can say you've made your point than in reaching a point of understanding. I'm happy to keep explaining why I find scenes to be good if you have any more you think are bad, and if there is one that I agree is bad I'll be glad to say it, I just can't think of one. But if you're only interested in finding some method by which to say "AH HA!!!" then I don't know what the point is.

Do you have any other factors in the MCU you think are bad? Because how Ant Man's powers work isn't one of them.

I concentrated on one aspect because you failed to answer it properly. I'm not going to move on to a different topic and allow you a pass on this one. I noticed that you still keep ignoring the train feat. Also, how can you claim consistency when it specifically stated in the movie that Antman's mass remains the same, and then they go to show instances of him not maintaining said mass?

The reason I'm concentrating on Antman is because you claimed Lois broke the law of physics by falling when everyone else was being pulled up. Agreed. I'm showing you that MCU does things like this too at times. Now if you want to excuse Antman's misuse of physics by saying "At least he does it consistently" then we can also apply the same rules to Lois by saying "hey, she consistently appears when she's needed, even if that means falling down from the sky". Like I said originally, you've been applying a double standard ever since. You can't even address the train getting derailed by hitting YJ. The fact that you think MCU movies are flawless already speak volumes.