I FK'ing Love Age Of Ultron

I FK'ing Love Age Of Ultron Jun 1, 2017 15:38:16 GMT

Quote

Post by Skaathar on Jun 1, 2017 15:38:16 GMT

Jun 1, 2017 15:33:48 GMT ArArArchStanton said:

Jun 1, 2017 15:18:07 GMT Skaathar said:

I concentrated on one aspect because you failed to answer it properly. I'm not going to move on to a different topic and allow you a pass on this one. I noticed that you still keep ignoring the train feat. Also, how can you claim consistency when it specifically stated in the movie that Antman's mass remains the same, and then they go to show instances of him not maintaining said mass?

The reason I'm concentrating on Antman is because you claimed Lois broke the law of physics by falling when everyone else was being pulled up. Agreed. I'm showing you that MCU does things like this too at times. Now if you want to excuse Antman's misuse of physics by saying "At least he does it consistently" then we can also apply the same rules to Lois by saying "hey, she consistently appears when she's needed, even if that means falling down from the sky". Like I said originally, you've been applying a double standard ever since. You can't even address the train getting derailed by hitting YJ. The fact that you think MCU movies are flawless already speak volumes.

Lois isn't designed to break the laws of physics, and that's not the only problem with that scene. The two major offenses are she's falling while cars far heavier than her are being lifted, and despite falling in one shot she then has to be saved by Superman who is flying with all his might. Why did he need to save her? She was falling right? Why was she falling if she was being sucked up with the cars? The shot itself makes no sense, forget the physics of it.

Ant man is designed to bend the laws of physics, and the way it's shown is presented consistently, as I've explained several times now.

The train weighs like nothing. It's a toy train. Who cares? It's a non issue. It's hilarious.

The fact that you have to get this nitpicky to try and convince me there are flaws in the MCU speaks volumes. And the fact that you have to try and make and equivalence between the Lois black hole scene and the toy train scene, just to try and say I'm being hypocritical in some way tells even more.

Do you have an actual problem with the MCU?

The toy train still has more mass than an ant. An ant standing in the path of the train won't derail it. The fact that it got derailed, heck the fact that it stopped dead in its tracks means it hit something with a lot more mass than it has. And YJ wasn't exactly punching it either, he just stood there.

See, this is what I'm hearing from you. DCEU movie breaks the laws of physics - you say it was a flaw and a mistake. MCU breaks the laws of physics - you say the character was meant to break/bend the laws of physics. You'd have to be trolling to not see how blatant your double standards are. Actually, just the fact that you claim the MCU is completely flawless already shows how unreasonable you are. So I really shouldn't be surprised.