|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jun 1, 2017 22:31:35 GMT
My only real issue is this insistence that physicalism should be accepted over alternatives because it is coherent and they are not.
There is nothing incoherent about physicalism. You can actually do something with it (i.e., science). Idealism or any other alternative just lets you sit in the safety of your armchair imagining that you've learned something when you've done nothing but spin your tires.Well, whatever it is you appear to think you are doing, other than spin your tires, doesn't appear to be offering much insight. It is coming from a sequestered mind set. All you and Terrapin appear to be spouting, is transparent and confounded rhetoric. If that's not spinning ones tires, then what is? |
|
