Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2017 11:22:51 GMT
I'm not talking about inaccuracies (many of those can be explained away by distorted light or whatever) but that there appears to be an intermediatory between the retina and what is consciously (re)presented. It's important to remember that naive realism is a theory of perception. Perception requires a brain. It's something our brains do. Naive realism isn't a theory of non-perception. Then how would you discern naive realism from indirect realism? What is the core difference between them?
|
|