Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 2, 2017 18:23:40 GMT
Why should I bother when it seems clear you're not interested in an honest discussion? I just finished giving you a clear flaw in Antman: that they said he maintains mass and yet has multiple scenes that contradict that - but instead of acknowledging this issue (which is clearly obvious) you choose to close your eyes and insist that it's perfectlt consistent.
So I'm sure I can list down every flaw the MCU has and you'll still insist that the MCU is flawless. It's really not worth the effort talking to you if you're dead set on believing the MCU is perfect. Just look at how you defend Malekith.
I've been honest. You're down to trying to relate Ant Man to real world physics and claiming that's a problem. It's not, they presented the fictional physics consistently well. And we already covered Malekith. Frankly I don't see what there is to dislike, but I already presented what I find enjoyable about him.
Instead of listening to me, and at the very least expressing an understanding for why I appreciate these elements even if you disagree, you just keep expressing that you're confused why I don't accept them as bad. I don't. I'm trying to tell you why. Is it more important for you to consider a positive outlook on these things or to insist I should have a negative outlook on them?
I would genuinely love to hear a top 10 list of other problems though. It would be awesome to discuss, and I'd actually enjoy your thoughts on my responses. I find this challenging and interesting.