Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2017 20:43:32 GMT
Why so much reliance everywhere on RT scores? I'm expecting (hoping) for a lot from WW. JLA I don't have high hopes for Spider-Man I think might surprise me Thor I think will prove to be the big success Kingsman 2 could either be amazing or a little disappointing RT scores are the best way to objectively measure the quality of a movie. It isn't perfect but it's a good measuring stick. I respectfully disagree. As I understand Rotten Tomatoes it just adds up the amount of good and bad reviews and bases a percentage on that calculation. But how do they decide a review is bad? Do they also include reviews in other languages than english? And if the review states the movie is mediocre does that count as a good or bad review? I will take Iron Fist as an example. Lots of reviews counted for the RT scores were based on the first 6 episodes or even only the first. The show definitely picks up in the last few episodes so that part doesnt get translated in the score. Also a lot of reviews were bad because they said the main character should have been Asian. Well that isnt fair since the Iron Fist they went with was Danny Rand who always have been a white guy. Still it didnt help the RT score even though its clearly weird. Dont get me wrong I have my issues with Iron Fist and think its the weakest thing in the MCU but its a better show than the RT score would have you believe.
|
|