Post by Prime etc. on Jun 28, 2021 15:53:44 GMT
Communist leadership is not poor.
Castro was not poor.
He was rich--he just sought to be the only game in town. I am not sure he was actually Cuban either.
He eliminated the ability for people to have their own business--there are a lot of doctors in Cuba--an army of them apparently. But what if you biologically or merit-wise are not inclined to be a doctor?
Then what?
It doesn't matter because the collective wants you to be a doctor.
It's not a normal way to have a society--a society where people gravitate towards their natural strengths is more holistic.
And as for poverty, if the society is small enough, you won't have poverty because everyone knows each other.
If you notice the trends in media, they really hate the idea of a natural chieftain. Trump was regarded as that type.
Bush was not-and they loved him.
Stalin was not a natural chieftain--he was installed by a committee. He wasn't Russian, he was Georgian, and he was set up as leader over people of different clans.
That just does not work.
You end up with the problems of "different strokes for different folks."
Many government problems we see today all arise from the idea that you can centralize society and have a minority controlling the majority.
But everybody is of the same tribe in that situation. They have a connection to each other.
But with all the immigration and spreading of populations, it is much more fragmented and chaotic.
Communism cannot work because it is not sincere --there is no sincere motivation by communist leadership to be kind to the population. The proof of that should be that when Communists took over Russia--they massacred all their ideological enemies. They banned marriage, they made laws that punished people for nationalistic sentiments.
You had to worship the image of Lenin.
And he is said to have referred to the communist foot solder as "useful idiots."
The earliest forms of capitalism were a form of communal living.
They were all part of the same small community and they all knew each other.
The modern corporate definition of capitalism is "money is God" and that is not the grass-roots, small business view of capitalism.
And funny enough--that big C definition of capitalism, they like communist China a lot.
So much so that they were sending alfalfa to China during a California drought-so people in California had to conserve water while it was being sent to China for its new agriculture program--cattle food. Why don't they grow their own you ask? Because China, due to its government, ruined its land and water--because communism does not use merit in decision-making very often.
Castro was not poor.
He was rich--he just sought to be the only game in town. I am not sure he was actually Cuban either.
He eliminated the ability for people to have their own business--there are a lot of doctors in Cuba--an army of them apparently. But what if you biologically or merit-wise are not inclined to be a doctor?
Then what?
It doesn't matter because the collective wants you to be a doctor.
It's not a normal way to have a society--a society where people gravitate towards their natural strengths is more holistic.
And as for poverty, if the society is small enough, you won't have poverty because everyone knows each other.
If you notice the trends in media, they really hate the idea of a natural chieftain. Trump was regarded as that type.
Bush was not-and they loved him.
Stalin was not a natural chieftain--he was installed by a committee. He wasn't Russian, he was Georgian, and he was set up as leader over people of different clans.
That just does not work.
You end up with the problems of "different strokes for different folks."
Many government problems we see today all arise from the idea that you can centralize society and have a minority controlling the majority.
It is not the same as a natural chieftain-ideally---the idea behind that, is that the most capable person becomes leader at that time or it is hereditary--the idea behind that is if the parents are healthy the child will be too. So if you have "good breeding" you should have a leadership continuum. Not the case with Trudeau or Bush because good breeding doesn't apply in their cases. That's why they are messed up--Trudeau's fascination with blackface cosplay.
But everybody is of the same tribe in that situation. They have a connection to each other.
But with all the immigration and spreading of populations, it is much more fragmented and chaotic.
Communism cannot work because it is not sincere --there is no sincere motivation by communist leadership to be kind to the population. The proof of that should be that when Communists took over Russia--they massacred all their ideological enemies. They banned marriage, they made laws that punished people for nationalistic sentiments.
You had to worship the image of Lenin.
And he is said to have referred to the communist foot solder as "useful idiots."
The earliest forms of capitalism were a form of communal living.
They were all part of the same small community and they all knew each other.
The modern corporate definition of capitalism is "money is God" and that is not the grass-roots, small business view of capitalism.
And funny enough--that big C definition of capitalism, they like communist China a lot.
So much so that they were sending alfalfa to China during a California drought-so people in California had to conserve water while it was being sent to China for its new agriculture program--cattle food. Why don't they grow their own you ask? Because China, due to its government, ruined its land and water--because communism does not use merit in decision-making very often.