Post by thorshairspray on Jun 5, 2017 23:02:04 GMT
tpfkar
thorshairspray said: Except I just stated why in the previous post. And in a post earlier to Superdude. And what did I lie about this time? If you could be bothered to watch the video that I didn't actually film or upload to Twitter, you can see why I assume he is staff.
That there was a concerted effort by the Muslim community to protest this attack.
The question on the table was "But what explanation are you offering for why certain minorities are overrepresented in certain crimes?"
You stated why you concluded they were CNN? Okden. You lied about why you didn't post pics of the guys we were talking about and instead 3 other people. And you said nothing about why they should be CNN staffers. You lied in the other thread about who again introduced "notall".
Oh dear.
You stated why you concluded they were CNN?
Yes, in the post preceding you saying I hadn't done so.
You lied about why you didn't post pics of the guys we were talking about and instead 3 other people.
No I didn't. I told you I would not be bothering to take multiple screen shot and uploading and posting them when the people can be seen in the video already posted. How can that be a lie?
And you said nothing about why they should be CNN staffers.
I made the claim they were staff. You asked why they were staff. I said because they were directing the people were to stand and place flowers. So either you don't bother to read threads, or are really thick.
You said "And how did you come to conclude that a person or people in a "Sarsour T" is/are (a) "CNN staffer"(s)?
"
Which I quoted and replied."The guy in the Sarsour T shirt is directing the other people where to stand and where to place flowers. He is in the BBC pic, first on the left.
"
So no, I'm not lying or avoiding anything.
You lied in the other thread about who again introduced "notall".
No I didn't, the op contain the argument "they don't represent Islam" which is a not all argument.
Impressive list of fail by you, beaten only by your spectacular use of English.