|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jul 24, 2021 22:43:41 GMT
I do think that they’re starting to rely on Easter eggs too much as a formula. They need to get back to things like character’s personal dilemma, archenemies, motivations, and just stories that are written a little better. Your quote I hi-lighted in bold made me chuckle. The minute I saw it, it made me think of the writing for the Disney Star Wars trilogy. Are Easter eggs used in the print comics? If so, then the film-verse is rightfully keeping within the genre. But I daresay a lot of the so-called eggs are not eggs at all. Even so, if looking for Easter eggs is part of a viewers total enjoyment experience, what’s wrong with that. It’s claimed this is getting in the way of the drama, maybe so, but I’m not disappointed in the TV shows. Flawed they were, but not bad. Actually, overall, pretty good. Frankly, I find it fun that there’s a brief glimpse at what might be Peggy Carter being time arrested by the TVA. After all, she and Cap might be living “illegally” in two timelines on the MCU: one where he’s trapped in ice for decades; the other he’s living life as her husband. And folks like to come to these websites to share the fun, not be castigated for not expecting each film to be Citizen Kane. So, yeah, imagining alternative scenarios that might come to pass in a future story is part of the fun. Killjoys looking for sour grapes are not part of the fun. Easter eggs are great and fun, nobody is hating on them. What we're saying is that the shows should not be dependent on them in order to be good. The easter eggs are extra toppings. They should add a bit of extra flavor but the dish should be able to stand on its own even without them. Take for example Kang. If you didn't know who he was and if you didn't know what a multiverse meant for the future of the MCU, would you consider that final showdown of Loki a strong climax worthy of a finale?
|
|