|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Jun 6, 2017 16:22:01 GMT
I started a thread about this earlier. I have my doubts about this one because it feels rushed to me. But in Marvel I trust. If it feels rushed, that is likely because it was rushed... I don't think anyone would dispute that. Once Marvel and Sony saw the overwhelmingly positive reaction to Tom Holland, they decided to make a new Spider-Man movie a high priority for the studio(s). That said, the trailers don't look like a rushed production to me. It appears that even in the limited amount of time Sony and Marvel had - they pulled something together that looks and feels thoughtfully considered - to my eye. Does it have some flaws, yes? Some of the marketing and an over-reliance on Iron Man come to mind. That said, remember the huge negative outcry from fans after seeing Spider-Man at the end of the Civil War trailer? Oh boohoohoo, the costume is all wrong. Boohoohoo, why are the eyes expressive? It's a Deadpool rip-off. Boohoohoo, he looks too animated. And then Civil War came out, and we got our socks knocked right the fuck off. Hoping for something similar here... SaveSaveIf I'm not mistaken, Marvel and Sony announced Spider-Man will appear in the MCU in February 2015 and that he would get his own feature movie for a late July 2017 release date. Tom Holland was cast as Peter Parker months later. We're now in 2017, that was 2 years ago. I don't feel this movie is forced at all.
|
|