|
|
Post by Fox in the Snow on Sept 13, 2021 4:08:17 GMT
What does that even mean? If you're implying that I think films can be judged as "objectively" good or bad, you couldn't be further from the truth. Apart from on a few purely technical levels (which even then can be argued as being "accepted norms" as opposed to objectively correct ways to perform the task) I believe appreciation of all art is completely subjective. Hence my point - even is something is massively popular and liked by everyone, bar one person, doesn't make that person's opinion any less valid. I said you equate quality with objectivety when quality is completely subjective. We the audience gets to decide if a movie is good or bad. And if you read my whole response you'd see that was pretty much what I said. Quality is subjective. A film's popularity or how much it makes (a more or less objective measure) is not an inherent sign of quality.
|
|