|
|
Post by darkreviewer2013 on Oct 8, 2021 11:35:33 GMT
Definitely not as good as Prince of Darkness. I agree. It's basically a reboot of the Hammer Dracula franchise, just with more blood and guts. I liked it too, but not on the level of the earlier sequels. Yeah, and quite a large (not that I complain about it) damn hot ladies, and lots of cleavage shots as well. But the rather increased and at times brutal scenes, including far more blood and gore, was quite intense and heavy, compared to most of the other Dracula releases I have been through. I guess the producers felt they needed to do some changes, in order to compete with other horror films, and where I guess they thought including more nasty and sexy stuff, would keep the afloat for a while longer, with the audiences. That's what happened with Hammer in the 70s. I think they were struggling to compete with the more intense American horror movies that were being produced, so they upped the sex and violence.
|
|
