|
|
Post by cupcakes on Jun 12, 2017 11:14:11 GMT
tpfkar Nor would that be remarkable. Not that it is even necessarily possible, but in the hypothetical. Everything we do is by definition because we preferred to do it. "Free will" doesn't require incoherencies like expecting an exact being with exactly the same properties, time etc., to arbitrarily make different/random choices. "Free will" founded on deranged behaviour is a useless version of free will indeed. There is a reason for everything that happens, again nothing remarkable about that. Having "reasons", i.e. "existing" does not in any way preclude it being free will. Not having reasons would make it, colloquially, insanity. Can neuroscience understand Donkey Kong?
|
|