Post by cupcakes on Jun 16, 2017 0:19:43 GMT
tpfkar
@miccee said: From above ""fairest state of affairs for society" compared to the actual quote: "And if society wants the fairest possible state of affairs, that would mean no humans and no society." Those are not identical and have different meanings, therefore it is misquoted.

It means that the effects cannot precede the cause. Our will cannot precede the events that created our will, therefore it is not meaningfully 'free'. For free will to exist in anything beyond the strictest compatibilist sense, we would need to have chosen our will before having a will with which to choose. A logical as well as physical impossibility.
A computer produces output which follows on in a deterministic fashion from what is input. All evidence, as well as logic, indicates that our brains do the same. But that isn't good enough for you, because you want to see yourself as the protagonist in some grand cosmic game of Cowboys and Indians. You demand a heroic and grandiose narrative where it's you and your free will taking on the universe. I diagnose a case of repressed existential angst.
There are several experiments, indicating that the decision may be made up to 10 seconds prior to entering awareness.
documents.mx/documents/soon-et-al-2008-unconscious-determinants-of-free-decisions-in-the-human-brain.html
documents.mx/documents/soon-et-al-2008-unconscious-determinants-of-free-decisions-in-the-human-brain.html
And if society wants the fairest possible state of affairs, that would mean no humans and no society.
