Post by ArArArchStanton on Feb 27, 2017 9:24:40 GMT
Not at all.
If you're claiming they work different somewhere.
A = invariant laws of physics.
Me: Is there evidence for A?
You: show me evidence for not A.
A = an invariant deity.
Me: Is there evidence for A?
Theist: show me evidence for not A.
I cannot tell your logic from theist logic.
That's simple. I'm not claiming either of those exist or don't exist. There is no reason to believe there are invariant laws or invariant deities, and as soon as you find evidence for either, I'll gladly believe it.
The difference is that theists are claiming something exists. I'm not.
I don't know how you think that is the same, or what you're confused about.