|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jun 23, 2017 17:04:55 GMT
The testing can be rigged in order to yield predictable results, yes? As Cinemachinery said, scientific claims are typically peer reviewed. If the study isn't legit or the results are rather scientifically lacking, the claim typically gets rejected by the science community. The Piltdown Man hoax is a good example of this. Yes, I know about Piltdown Man. Too bad the scientific community can't do the same with the manmade global warming hoax, but times are different now. |
|
