|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jun 23, 2017 17:10:14 GMT
As Cinemachinery said, scientific claims are typically peer reviewed. If the study isn't legit or the results are rather scientifically lacking, the claim typically gets rejected by the science community. The Piltdown Man hoax is a good example of this. Yes, I know about Piltdown Man. Too bad the scientific community can't do the same with the manmade global warming hoax, but times are different now. ''but times are different now."
Yes, you are right, times are different now in that technology and scientific methods have greatly improved. That's rather the reason Piltown Man wasn't confirmed to be a hoax for a considerable time. A forged fossil today would quickly be disproven.
|
|
