|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Jun 23, 2017 19:35:36 GMT
As Cinemachinery said, scientific claims are typically peer reviewed. If the study isn't legit or the results are rather scientifically lacking, the claim typically gets rejected by the science community. The Piltdown Man hoax is a good example of this. Yes, I know about Piltdown Man. Too bad the scientific community can't do the same with the manmade global warming hoax, but times are different now. I am not at all surprised that you missed the point of the OP completely. That's okay, I won't waste time trying to cure you of your delusional conspiratorial fantasies. If you didn't have ridiculous bullshit you would be so far outside your comfort zone that you would be permanently lost. |
|
