Post by london777 on Jun 28, 2017 3:39:14 GMT
The intriguing thing about Kiss Me Deadly is that it represents one of the last classic films noir while also anticipating the James Bond era.
What would your argument be against Touch of Evil constituting the final "pure noir"? I can see what you mean (if you meant it), but I am curious as to your articulation. Too inherently parodic? Too self-conscious?
The reason I do not think it is "pure" noir is that Heston, the protagonist, is not a conflicted or ambiguous character. He has a difficult and dangerous job but there is no sense that he is trapped by fate or has made bad choices. Quinlan could have been a typical noir protagonist. Pete Menzies and Tana both tell us he once once a great cop even if his method were dubious, but by the time we see him he is just a corrupt wreck. Quinlan was doomed by bad choices but this was not central to the movie and his decline was complete before the action starts.
I have never considered it parodic, but a bit self-conscious maybe:
Pure noir = we have a minimal budget and half the crew start on another movie in two weeks. Let us do this thing and no retakes.
Touch of Evil = I am a genius and I am going to make a noir which is a work of art (except that he would not have thought of it as "noir" that early).
I do like the film but it is a long way from the central noir canon.

